1995 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1957 Mercedes-Benz SC
To start off, 1995 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Mercedes-Benz SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Mercedes-Benz SC would be higher. At 2,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mercedes-Benz E (149 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1957 Mercedes-Benz SC. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1957 Mercedes-Benz SC.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mercedes-Benz E (220 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Mercedes-Benz SC. (162 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1995 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Mercedes-Benz SC.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mercedes-Benz E | 1957 Mercedes-Benz SC | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | E | SC |
Year Released | 1995 | 1957 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2295 cc | 2193 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90.9 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.4 mm | 72.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 7.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2830 mm |