1995 Mercedes-Benz E420 vs. 1959 Seat 600
To start off, 1995 Mercedes-Benz E420 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1995 Mercedes-Benz E420 (275 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 256 more horse power than 1959 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mercedes-Benz E420 should accelerate faster than 1959 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mercedes-Benz E420 weights approximately 1477 kg more than 1959 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mercedes-Benz E420 (400 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 360 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1995 Mercedes-Benz E420 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mercedes-Benz E420 | 1959 Seat 600 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Seat |
Model | E420 | 600 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 40 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2052 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2010 mm |