1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK vs. 1950 Riley RM A
To start off, 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK weights approximately 815 kg more than 1950 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK | 1950 Riley RM A | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Riley |
Model | SLK | RM A |
Year Released | 1995 | 1950 |
Engine Size | 2295 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2050 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2870 mm |