1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK vs. 2011 Opel Combo
To start off, 2011 Opel Combo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK would be higher. At 2,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK (190 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 2011 Opel Combo. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK should accelerate faster than 2011 Opel Combo.
Because 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Opel Combo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK (280 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Opel Combo. (126 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Opel Combo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK | 2011 Opel Combo | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Opel |
| Model | SLK | Combo |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2295 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 126 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Top Speed | 226 km/hour | 164 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.4 seconds | 14 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 52 L |
