1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK vs. 2013 Mazda 3
To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK would be higher. At 2,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK (190 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2013 Mazda 3. (155 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK weights approximately 749 kg more than 2013 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK (280 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda 3. (200 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda 3. 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK has automatic transmission and 2013 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2013 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK | 2013 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mazda |
Model | SLK | 3 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2295 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90.9 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.4 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 12.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2052 kg | 1303 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4595 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.6 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 55 L |