1995 Mercury Grand Marquis vs. 1996 Proton 400
To start off, 1996 Proton 400 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis (209 HP) has 142 more horse power than 1996 Proton 400. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis weights approximately 600 kg more than 1996 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Proton 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mercury Grand Marquis | 1996 Proton 400 | |
Make | Mercury | Proton |
Model | Grand Marquis | 400 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 209 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 1115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1700 mm |