1995 Mercury Grand Marquis vs. 2010 Tata Nano
To start off, 2010 Tata Nano is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis (209 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 2010 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis should accelerate faster than 2010 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis weights approximately 1115 kg more than 2010 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mercury Grand Marquis | 2010 Tata Nano | |
Make | Mercury | Tata |
Model | Grand Marquis | Nano |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 209 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1495 mm |