1995 Mercury Tracer vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mercury Tracer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mercury Tracer would be higher. At 1,859 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mercury Tracer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mercury Tracer (87 HP) has 19 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mercury Tracer should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mercury Tracer (146 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (115 Nm). This means 1995 Mercury Tracer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mercury Tracer | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
| Make | Mercury | Chevrolet |
| Model | Tracer | Aveo |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1859 cc | 1206 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 68 HP |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4039 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1735 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1516 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2525 mm |
