1995 MG RV8 vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 MG RV8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 MG RV8 would be higher. At 3,900 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 MG RV8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 MG RV8 (190 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 6. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 MG RV8 should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 6.
Because 1995 MG RV8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 MG RV8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 1995 MG RV8 has manual transmission. 1995 MG RV8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 MG RV8 | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | MG | Mazda |
| Model | RV8 | 6 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3900 cc | 1798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 5.9 seconds | 11.7 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
