1995 Mini MK VI vs. 2009 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2009 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mini MK VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mini MK VI would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Saab 03-Sep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Saab 03-Sep (207 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1995 Mini MK VI. (41 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 1995 Mini MK VI.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Saab 03-Sep (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mini MK VI. (68 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2009 Saab 03-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mini MK VI. 2009 Saab 03-Sep has automatic transmission and 1995 Mini MK VI has manual transmission. 1995 Mini MK VI will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Saab 03-Sep will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mini MK VI | 2009 Saab 03-Sep | |
Make | Mini | Saab |
Model | MK VI | 03-Sep |
Year Released | 1995 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 996 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2710 mm |