1995 Mini MK VI vs. 2010 Honda Civic
To start off, 2010 Honda Civic is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mini MK VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mini MK VI would be higher. At 1,339 cc (2 cylinders), 2010 Honda Civic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Civic (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1995 Mini MK VI. (41 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1995 Mini MK VI.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Honda Civic (127 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mini MK VI. (68 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2010 Honda Civic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mini MK VI. 2010 Honda Civic has automatic transmission and 1995 Mini MK VI has manual transmission. 1995 Mini MK VI will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Honda Civic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mini MK VI | 2010 Honda Civic | |
Make | Mini | Honda |
Model | MK VI | Civic |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 996 cc | 1339 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1785 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1460 mm |