1995 Mini MK VI vs. 2012 Volvo S60
To start off, 2012 Volvo S60 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mini MK VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mini MK VI would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo S60 weights approximately 989 kg more than 1995 Mini MK VI.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo S60 (400 Nm @ 1250 RPM) has 332 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mini MK VI. (68 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mini MK VI. 2012 Volvo S60 has automatic transmission and 1995 Mini MK VI has manual transmission. 1995 Mini MK VI will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Volvo S60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mini MK VI | 2012 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Mini | Volvo |
Model | MK VI | S60 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 996 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 68 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 1250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1609 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1864 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2776 mm |