1995 Mitsubishi Gaus vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mitsubishi Gaus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mitsubishi Gaus would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Renault Clio (252 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1995 Mitsubishi Gaus. (208 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1995 Mitsubishi Gaus.
Because 1995 Mitsubishi Gaus is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mitsubishi Gaus will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 300 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mitsubishi Gaus | 2004 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
| Model | Gaus | Clio |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7150 RPM |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4650 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
