1995 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 2010 Chevrolet Traverse
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Traverse is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Traverse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Traverse (281 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Traverse should accelerate faster than 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Traverse weights approximately 1233 kg more than 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Traverse (360 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 252 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Traverse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer | 2010 Chevrolet Traverse | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Chevrolet |
| Model | Lancer | Traverse |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 281 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 108 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 2173 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 5207 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1991 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1849 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3020 mm |
