1995 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC60 (321 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 978 kg more than 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo XC60 (480 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 372 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mitsubishi Lancer | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
Model | Lancer | XC60 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 321 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 108 Nm | 480 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1918 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4627 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1891 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1713 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2774 mm |