1995 Mitsubishi Pajero vs. 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk
To start off, 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk would be higher. At 3,041 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk weights approximately 500 kg more than 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero.
Because 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk has automatic transmission and 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero has manual transmission. 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mitsubishi Pajero | 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Studebaker |
Model | Pajero | Silver Hawk |
Year Released | 1995 | 1959 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 700 cc | 3041 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 5190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1820 mm |