1995 Mitsubishi Pajero vs. 1968 Rover 2000
To start off, 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Rover 2000 weights approximately 480 kg more than 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero.
Because 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Rover 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero | 1968 Rover 2000 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Rover |
| Model | Pajero | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1100 cc | 3532 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 142 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1330 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1690 mm |
