1995 Mitsubishi Pajero vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
| Model | Pajero | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 700 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1980 mm |
