1995 Mitsubishi Pajero vs. 2010 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2010 Toyota Matrix is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 574 kg more than 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero.
Because 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Toyota Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mitsubishi Pajero | 2010 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | Pajero | Matrix |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 700 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1424 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4394 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1765 mm |