1995 Mitsubishi Pajero vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Toyota Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Toyota Matrix has automatic transmission and 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero has manual transmission. 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Toyota Matrix will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mitsubishi Pajero | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | Pajero | Matrix |
Year Released | 1995 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1100 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1765 mm |