1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs. 2006 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2006 Toyota Camry is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner would be higher. At 2,358 cc, 2006 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Camry (154 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner. (120 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Camry (217 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner. (164 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner | 2006 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | Space Runner | Camry |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1834 cc | 2358 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 217 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2730 mm |
