1995 Mitsubishi Space Wagon vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mitsubishi Space Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mitsubishi Space Wagon would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mitsubishi Space Wagon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mitsubishi Space Wagon (131 HP) has 64 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mitsubishi Space Wagon should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Mitsubishi Space Wagon | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | Space Wagon | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2490 mm |