1995 Morgan 4 vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1995 Morgan 4. (112 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1995 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 884 kg more than 1995 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Morgan 4. (160 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Morgan 4.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Morgan 4 | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Morgan | Jeep |
Model | 4 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 112 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.6 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 87 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1764 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 78 L |