1995 Nissan 100 NX vs. 1972 Volvo 140
To start off, 1995 Nissan 100 NX is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Nissan 100 NX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Nissan 100 NX (141 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1972 Volvo 140. (97 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Nissan 100 NX should accelerate faster than 1972 Volvo 140. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Volvo 140 weights approximately 125 kg more than 1995 Nissan 100 NX.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Nissan 100 NX (182 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Volvo 140. (153 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1995 Nissan 100 NX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Nissan 100 NX | 1972 Volvo 140 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | 100 NX | 140 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 182 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1450 mm |