1995 Nissan 200 SX Silvia vs. 1952 Riley RM A
To start off, 1995 Nissan 200 SX Silvia is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Nissan 200 SX Silvia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Nissan 200 SX Silvia weights approximately 25 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Nissan 200 SX Silvia | 1952 Riley RM A | |
Make | Nissan | Riley |
Model | 200 SX Silvia | RM A |
Year Released | 1995 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2870 mm |