1995 Nissan AA-X vs. 1964 Rover P6
To start off, 1995 Nissan AA-X is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Rover P6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Rover P6 would be higher. At 1,978 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Rover P6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Rover P6 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1995 Nissan AA-X.
Because 1964 Rover P6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Rover P6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Nissan AA-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Nissan AA-X | 1964 Rover P6 | |
| Make | Nissan | Rover |
| Model | AA-X | P6 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1273 cc | 1978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1280 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2630 mm |
