1995 Nissan AA-X vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan AA-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan AA-X would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Nissan AA-X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1995 Nissan AA-X has manual transmission. 1995 Nissan AA-X will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Nissan AA-X | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | AA-X | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1273 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2490 mm |