1995 Nissan AA-X vs. 2009 Volvo S40
To start off, 2009 Volvo S40 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan AA-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan AA-X would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volvo S40 weights approximately 370 kg more than 1995 Nissan AA-X.
Because 2009 Volvo S40 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Nissan AA-X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S40 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Volvo S40 has automatic transmission and 1995 Nissan AA-X has manual transmission. 1995 Nissan AA-X will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Volvo S40 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Nissan AA-X | 2009 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | AA-X | S40 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1273 cc | 2521 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 227 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1630 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2650 mm |