1995 Nissan AA-X vs. 2010 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2010 Fiat Croma is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan AA-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan AA-X would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Fiat Croma weights approximately 245 kg more than 1995 Nissan AA-X.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Nissan AA-X | 2010 Fiat Croma | |
Make | Nissan | Fiat |
Model | AA-X | Croma |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1273 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1505 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2710 mm |