1995 Nissan AA-X vs. 2011 Ford E-350
To start off, 2011 Ford E-350 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan AA-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan AA-X would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1570 kg more than 1995 Nissan AA-X.
Because 2011 Ford E-350 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Ford E-350. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Nissan AA-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Ford E-350 has automatic transmission and 1995 Nissan AA-X has manual transmission. 1995 Nissan AA-X will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Ford E-350 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Nissan AA-X | 2011 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Nissan | Ford |
| Model | AA-X | E-350 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1273 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 255 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 2830 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3505 mm |
