1995 Nissan Cefiro vs. 2010 Kia Forte
To start off, 2010 Kia Forte is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan Cefiro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan Cefiro would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Kia Forte is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Nissan Cefiro weights approximately 136 kg more than 2010 Kia Forte.
Because 1995 Nissan Cefiro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Nissan Cefiro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Forte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1995 Nissan Cefiro has automatic transmission and 2010 Kia Forte has manual transmission. 2010 Kia Forte will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Nissan Cefiro will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Nissan Cefiro | 2010 Kia Forte | |
Make | Nissan | Kia |
Model | Cefiro | Forte |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 173 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1294 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4529 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1775 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1461 mm |