1995 Nissan Cefiro vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan Cefiro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan Cefiro would be higher. At 2,183 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 6 weights approximately 120 kg more than 1995 Nissan Cefiro.
Because 1995 Nissan Cefiro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Nissan Cefiro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Nissan Cefiro | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Nissan | Mazda |
Model | Cefiro | 6 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 2183 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 127 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4755 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1795 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1440 mm |