1995 Nissan Cima vs. 1986 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1995 Nissan Cima is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Nissan Cima. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Nissan Cima | 1986 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Nissan | Ford |
| Model | Cima | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1986 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2998 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1770 mm |
