1995 Nissan Cima vs. 1996 Rover 220
To start off, 1996 Rover 220 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan Cima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan Cima would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Nissan Cima weights approximately 316 kg more than 1996 Rover 220.
Because 1995 Nissan Cima is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Nissan Cima. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Rover 220, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Nissan Cima | 1996 Rover 220 | |
| Make | Nissan | Rover |
| Model | Cima | 220 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2998 cc | 1993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 103 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1214 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
