1995 Nissan Cima vs. 2009 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2009 Nissan Micra is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan Cima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan Cima would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Nissan Cima weights approximately 540 kg more than 2009 Nissan Micra.
Because 1995 Nissan Cima is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Nissan Cima. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Nissan Cima | 2009 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Nissan | Nissan |
Model | Cima | Micra |
Year Released | 1995 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2998 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 88 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |