1995 Nissan CQ-X vs. 2006 Renault Grand Scenic
To start off, 2006 Renault Grand Scenic is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan CQ-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan CQ-X would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Nissan CQ-X is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Grand Scenic weights approximately 798 kg more than 1995 Nissan CQ-X.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1995 Nissan CQ-X has automatic transmission and 2006 Renault Grand Scenic has manual transmission. 2006 Renault Grand Scenic will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Nissan CQ-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Nissan CQ-X | 2006 Renault Grand Scenic | |
| Make | Nissan | Renault |
| Model | CQ-X | Grand Scenic |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1870 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 119 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 188 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 852 kg | 1650 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2740 mm |
