1995 Nissan CQ-X vs. 2008 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2008 Volvo XC90 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan CQ-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan CQ-X would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1328 kg more than 1995 Nissan CQ-X.
Because 2008 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Nissan CQ-X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Nissan CQ-X | 2008 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | CQ-X | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 182 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 852 kg | 2180 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2860 mm |
