1995 Nissan Pulsar vs. 2001 Suzuki Covie
To start off, 2001 Suzuki Covie is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Nissan Pulsar (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2001 Suzuki Covie. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 2001 Suzuki Covie. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 350 kg more than 2001 Suzuki Covie. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Suzuki Covie (178 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Nissan Pulsar. (147 Nm). This means 2001 Suzuki Covie will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Nissan Pulsar | 2001 Suzuki Covie | |
| Make | Nissan | Suzuki |
| Model | Pulsar | Covie |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1327 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 147 Nm | 178 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 2950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2010 mm |
