1995 Nissan Pulsar vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1995 Nissan Pulsar. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1995 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 2004 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Nissan Pulsar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1995 Nissan Pulsar has manual transmission. 1995 Nissan Pulsar will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Nissan Pulsar | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Pulsar | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2490 mm |