1995 Nissan Pulsar vs. 2004 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2004 Renault Scenic is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Renault Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Nissan Pulsar (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2004 Renault Scenic. (74 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Scenic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Scenic weights approximately 624 kg more than 1995 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Nissan Pulsar (148 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Scenic. (105 Nm). This means 1995 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Nissan Pulsar | 2004 Renault Scenic | |
| Make | Nissan | Renault |
| Model | Pulsar | Scenic |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 148 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1704 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2750 mm |
