1995 Oldsmobile Achieva vs. 1982 Zastava 750
To start off, 1995 Oldsmobile Achieva is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Oldsmobile Achieva is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Oldsmobile Achieva weights approximately 670 kg more than 1982 Zastava 750.
Because 1982 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Oldsmobile Achieva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1995 Oldsmobile Achieva has automatic transmission and 1982 Zastava 750 has manual transmission. 1982 Zastava 750 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Oldsmobile Achieva will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Oldsmobile Achieva | 1982 Zastava 750 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Zastava |
| Model | Achieva | 750 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 2400 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 33 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1390 mm |
