1995 Oldsmobile Aurora vs. 1973 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1995 Oldsmobile Aurora is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Oldsmobile Aurora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Oldsmobile Aurora (251 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1973 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Oldsmobile Aurora should accelerate faster than 1973 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Oldsmobile Aurora weights approximately 472 kg more than 1973 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Oldsmobile Aurora (353 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1995 Oldsmobile Aurora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Oldsmobile Aurora | 1973 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Triumph |
| Model | Aurora | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3995 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 353 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1248 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2700 mm |
