1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk

To start off, 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,247 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 136 kg more than 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk.

Because 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk has manual transmission. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk
Make Oldsmobile Studebaker
Model Cutlass Sky Hawk
Year Released 1995 1956
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3135 cc 4247 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 158 HP 0 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1536 kg 1400 kg
Vehicle Length 4930 mm 5150 mm
Vehicle Width 1810 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1530 mm
Wheelbase Size 2740 mm 2980 mm