1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 236 kg more than 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Because 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Studebaker |
Model | Cutlass | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 1995 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3135 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1536 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2980 mm |