1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 564 kg more than 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Cutlass | Silver Cloud |
Year Released | 1995 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3135 cc | 6230 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1536 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 5380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 3130 mm |