1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1968 Oldsmobile 442
To start off, 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Oldsmobile 442. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Oldsmobile 442 would be higher. At 6,556 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Oldsmobile 442 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Oldsmobile 442 weights approximately 89 kg more than 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1968 Oldsmobile 442 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Oldsmobile 442. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1968 Oldsmobile 442 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Oldsmobile |
Model | Cutlass | 442 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3135 cc | 6556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1536 kg | 1625 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2850 mm |