1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche weights approximately 744 kg more than 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Cutlass | Corniche |
Year Released | 1995 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3135 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1536 kg | 2280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 3030 mm |