1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2004 Volvo S40
To start off, 2004 Volvo S40 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo S40 (170 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (158 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 281 kg more than 2004 Volvo S40.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass (251 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Volvo S40. (240 Nm). This means 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Volvo S40.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2004 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Volvo |
Model | Cutlass | S40 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3135 cc | 1950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1536 kg | 1255 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2650 mm |