1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2006 BMW 530

To start off, 2006 BMW 530 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 530 (254 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (158 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 530 should accelerate faster than 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass.

Because 2006 BMW 530 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW 530. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 530 (301 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (251 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 BMW 530 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass.

Compare all specifications:

1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass 2006 BMW 530
Make Oldsmobile BMW
Model Cutlass 530
Year Released 1995 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3135 cc 2996 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 158 HP 254 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6600 RPM
Torque 251 Nm 301 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4930 mm 4850 mm
Vehicle Width 1810 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1500 mm
Wheelbase Size 2740 mm 2840 mm