1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2008 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2008 SsangYong Musso is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 340 kg more than 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2008 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass (251 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 SsangYong Musso. (250 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 SsangYong Musso.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2008 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Oldsmobile | SsangYong |
Model | Cutlass | Musso |
Year Released | 1995 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3135 cc | 2874 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1536 kg | 1876 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2760 mm |